Hi, Some additional comments:
- /RemoveMarkupInMessages: it makes no sense to set a goal for this, because a fixed module today might change tomorrow, introducing new strings with markup. Maybe should be set as a guideline (and the goal moved to the Expired section) - MesonPorting: should we move it to Current GNOME Goals - Goals about autotools: since we are moving to Meson, all autotools-related goals should be moved to the Deprecated section. Not sure about which goals are: have doubts about AddCodeCoverage, DistCheck. If someone of those goals is still valid, but needs some comments about Meson instead about autotools, we should update the info. We should also update the template to list only the core modules. The list can be obtained from the gnome-core-modules files from gnome-modulesets, is this right? I will help in whatever be in me hand :) 2017-08-23 18:32 GMT+02:00 Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>: > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:18 AM Sébastien Wilmet <swil...@gnome.org> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 06:42:07PM +0000, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: >> > I have gone ahead and contacted the >> > owners of all the GNOME Goals that were more than a year old and asked >> > whether they can either update the goal or retire it. >> >> You contacted me for 4 different GNOME goals, but I'm definitely not the >> owner of those! I'm probably just the latest person who edited those >> wiki pages… >> > > Sorry, my man! I looked at the last edit.. goals don't have an owner so I > had to go with whoever touched it last. I can see why people might feel > reluctant to be the owner, but it would be nice to have a group of people > responsibile for it if not an owner. Or DDL is the owner and I'll just > bring it on the list and see who takes charge. :-) > > So going forward we have: > > 1) reduce scope of the goals in regards to the modules > 2) move goals to expired or uneeded. Some of these goals have useful > information so I don't want to delete them. > > Anything else? I can volunteer to move all the autotools related work out > of the goals. But someone should take charge of reducing the scope. > Probably all that is required is to take the list, run it against the core > apps, and grep the status out of them and then put it back on the wiki. > > sri > > >> -- >> Sébastien >> > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
