On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 18:49 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote: > Hello community, > > I have good news, after few meetings and discussions with GitLab we > reached > an agreement on a way to bring the features we need and to fix our > most > important blockers > <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME-Community/GitLab-Infrastructure/issue > s/8> > in a reasonable time and in a way that are synced with us. Their team > will > fix our blockers in the next 1-2 months, most of them will be fix in > the > release of 22th of December and the rest if everything goes well in > the > release of 22th of January. The one left that will be an ongoing > effort out > of those 2 months is a richer UI experience for duplicates, which is > going > to be an ongoing effort. > > Apologies for the blockage for those that regularly asked to migrate > their > project, I wanted to make sure we are doing things in the right > steps. I > also wanted to make sure that I get feedback and comments about the > initiative all around in my effort to make a representation of the > community for taking these decisions. Now it's the point where I'm > confident, the feedback and comments both inside and outside of our > core > community has been largely that we should start our path to fully > migrate > to GitLab. > > So starting today we move forward to the next step, this means that > all > projects that want to migrate are free to migrate. I'm also > coordinating > with some core apps for a migration in the upcoming month (e.g. > Documents, > Photos, Boxes), with other core projects to be migrated once we have > in > GitLab the features we need (i.e. Software, Shell, Mutter), and more > platform-ish core projects like gtk+, glib etc. to be taken their > time to > ensure their migration is smooth. All depends individually of the > project > and the maintainer, of course. > [...]
Have you considered the backlash to GNOME that it may cause? https://twitter.com/Amorelandra/status/938444347506180096 I just learned about it. -- Germán Poo-Caamaño http://calcifer.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
