On 15/03/18 19:13, Simon McVittie wrote: > the hard division between one-to-one > messages and chatrooms in XMPP is unlike the variable-number-of-users > "switchboards" in the now-defunct MSNP.)
Out of interest, does Telepathy expose that difference? To me, that
kind of distinction seems like an implementation detail that I would
expect to be abstracted away.
> If the UX that your users expect is very much "the same shape" for a
> pair of protocols, then perhaps it makes sense to have an abstraction
> across those protocols; but is that really the case for all of them?
Good question. You tell me? :-)
I asked a friend of mine if I could observe her using WhatsApp. To me
it looks a lot like, if not exactly like an SMS/MMS messaging program.
And I would imagine Facebook's Messenger program. And no doubt lots of
other messaging programs. There doesn't seem to be any difference in
the basic UX. Group conversations, one-to-one conversations, text,
emojis, pictures, videos, possibly VoIP.
Of course, I don't have the depth of protocol knowledge that Telepathy
developers like yourself built up so perhaps my view is naive.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
