> Should issues be filed against Infrastructure/GitLab? Yeah please
> which Andre already raised. His proposal to send the announcement Maybe yeah, I have no idea how to do that or extract this information though. Feel free to send me the list of projects/contacts and I can definitely can send an email. > I really don’t think it is a big deal, especially if this is publicly announced It's not about if admins have powers or not, is about the fact of impersonating a user in comments. It's true that publicly announcing could be enough. However the other big issue is that notifications would be send massively, and I don't know how to prevent that. So that's basically a no-no from the start. Maybe some trick can be done, but no idea. On 21 March 2018 at 07:07, Alexandre Franke <afra...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > Could you create an issue for those you know so I can evaluate them one > by one? > > Ideally with a way to contact their maintainers. > > I don’t know of other projects from the top of my head and reviewing > the list at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=browse.html&; > classification=__all > is probably the only way, but that would require quite an investment > of time. I can’t take on that task right now and would appreciate > anyone volunteering to do it. This could be split amongst several > people. > > Should issues be filed against Infrastructure/GitLab? > > > In general I think these projects should decide themselves where they > want > > to live, and move either to one place or the other altogether. > > Sure, but they are unlikely to read d-d-l and similar lists as they > have little interaction with our community, which Andre already > raised. His proposal to send the announcement (amended with a note for > non-GNOME project that they can elect to migrate outside of the GNOME > infrastructure) sounds like a great idea. > > >> Any chance of getting https://gitlab.gnome.org/ > Incubator/bztogl/issues/7 > >> fixed before then? > > > > Not sure, I think impersonating is still something some people don't > agree > > with. > > With the kinds of power admins already have, I really don’t think it > is a big deal, especially if this is publicly announced. Did you > actually have people express concerns or are you just assuming like > you were in the first place? You already got positive feedback when > that was discussed last time. > > The legibility gain on the other hand *is* a big deal. > > >> Can we make a pass of archiving before that? > > > > That was my desire too, but the agreement seems to be on the opposite and > > have all the projects even for historical reasons. We could have a > subgroup > > for those though. > > Yes, a GNOME/Archives/ subgroup sounds good. > > > The work load for migrating git repositories is not an issue, on the > other > > hand migrating bugs is a big work load. > > Fair enough, archiving before migration and then moving them to the > GNOME/Archives/ subgroup would still make it easier to find stuff once > on Gitlab. Also archiving helps with translations and bugzilla. > > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
