On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 7:19 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 4:23 pm, Carlos Garnacho <carl...@gnome.org> > wrote:
> > Beyond that, AFAICT if other regular GNOME session services/apps > > indirectly rely on X11 at build/runtime, it's an oversight. > > Well there is libgnomekbd. That seems like the main issue currently, as > it's required for core desktop functionality It depends. If the goal is to not use X11 at runtime, then the tool provided by libgnomekbd is indeed one of the outstanding issues. But if the goal is a session with no X11 support at all, then two non-functional menu items in gnome-control-center/shell look tame compared to mutter's build dependencies IMHO :-) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
