Laca and Dave,

It looks you don't include SUNWdesktop-search (Meta Tracker) and its
dependencies (SUNWlibgsf and SUNWw3m) in the LiveCD. However, according
to the Indiana UI spec,
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/uispecs/indiana-uispec/, we
need to include them. There is a search applet in the panel to call
tracker-search-tool.

It will add more increases :(

BTW, SUNWgnome-config-editor (gconf-editor) is not shown in the menu by
default. Do we want to remove it from the liveCD?

Harry

Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> Dave,
>
> This is gonna be depressing, but the size of the GNOME packages
> with the 2.24 update is expected to increase by about 11MB
> (compressed!)  Attached is a StarOffice spreadsheed (and a pdf
> export for easier reading).
>
> It looks likes like firefox3 accounts for almost 1/3 of the
> size increase.
>
> There is 1 new required package, SUNWlibtasn1 but we should
> also consider SUNWespeak and SUNWgnome-a11y-speech-espeak for
> better accessibility support.
>
> Laca
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:10 -0400, Dave Miner wrote:
>   
>>> Filters are not yet implemented.
>>>
>>>       
>> One possible outcome here is that we ask IPS to kick up the priority of 
>> implementing filters to help solve the problem.
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for digging in, Laca.  We can certainly ensure that stuff 
>> that's split out into separate packages stays out.  For the moment, no 
>> need to do anything, I'm waiting on some data about l10n and other 
>> things before putting together revised recommendations.  Are there any 
>> other significant changes in the 2.23.x packages that we need to account 
>> for?
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> indiana-discuss mailing list
>> indiana-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/desktop-discuss/attachments/20080915/60e56784/attachment.html>

Reply via email to