I think we can add one more: Designer (user interface, system....)
Your suggestions are great though :) -Ghee Shawn Walker wrote: > On 20/11/2007, Stephen Lau <stevel at opensolaris.org> wrote: > >> Shawn Walker wrote: >> >>> On 20/11/2007, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith at sun.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Brian Nitz wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Contributions to the OpenSolaris desktop community can be any of the >>>>> following: >>>>> *1. Developer * >>>>> *2. QA * >>>>> *3. Doc Writer * >>>>> *4. Translator * >>>>> *5. Deployer * >>>>> *6. Evangelist * >>>>> *7. Facilitator * >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Should there be another one for UI/Graphics Designer for contributors >>>> like Calum & the xDesign guys? >>>> >>>> >>> How about "Architect" or "Designer" ? >>> >>> >>> >> Architect is too ambiguous, and gives me images of Calum being the guy >> from The Matrix. >> > > How do you know he isn't? :) > > >> HCI? UI Design? UED (User Experience Design)? >> > > Well, I think the key thing is to have a generic role to describe > these. Otherwise, you're going to end up with lots of different > possible roles and make the application process a little more > difficult. > > I'll use the (inevitable) example Ubuntu page here: > > http://www.ubuntu.com/community/participate > > They've split up getting involved into four categories: > > * Development > * Documentation > * Design > * Support > > I've run a little wild with my own artistic license and come up with this > list: > > * Builder ( sys admin, etc. ) > > * Designer ( art, ui, system architecture, etc. ) > > * Developer ( code ) > > * Herald ( advocacy, announcements, etc. ) > > * Scholar ( governance, documentation, web pages, translation, general > knowledge, etc. ) > > * Support ( qa, mailing list moderator, etc. ) > >
