Calum - I hear you on the empty desktop, my vote would be in order of pref:

Computer and Documents
Documents only

JR

Calum Benson wrote:

>
> On 28 Mar 2006, at 11:19, John Rice wrote:
>
>> I would love to see us drop the desktop icons as other distros are  
>> also doing. I gives a much cleaner desktop and users are free to  add 
>> icons from any of their menu entries by just dragging and  dropping 
>> them onto the desktop.
>
>
> I did think about that, but I'm not sure a /completely/ empty desktop  
> is necessarily a good move.  I agree that the fewer icons we have  
> there by default the better, but I think having even just one icon  
> there (as you get with first-time logins on both XP and MacOS, IIRC)  
> gives a good cue that it's an active space where more things might  
> appear or that you can add things to.  A completely empty desktop can  
> look a bit intimidating if it's the first thing you see when you log  
> in, and it could be perceived as dead space or even broken by users  
> who are used to seeing icons there.
>
> Also, we don't really have an obvious way to add to the 'special'  
> icons (like Computer and Network) back onto the desktop, for users  
> who do want them... you can indeed drag them from the Launch menu as  
> you say (and there's also a gconf key to turn them on or off), but I  
> can guarantee that dragging things from a menu to the desktop isn't  
> something that will cross most users' minds :)
>
> If people think it's a good idea, though, I could be persuaded to cut  
> back the number of default icons further than the current proposal,  
> e.g. maybe just have Documents, or Documents and Network, or Computer  
> and Documents.  It's your desktop guys, tell us what you want.
>
>> Are we planning to redo the icons and make them more conformant  with 
>> the Linux Icon standardisation project?
>
>
> Not as such, but we're getting a new theme from our branding guys for  
> our next productised release, which will include a complete new set  
> of icons (and they're aware of the Tango project).  Although I don't  
> know if the plan is to include that theme in the OpenSolaris desktop,  
> or if we'll be reserving it for the Solaris version only.
>
> Cheeri,
> Calum.
>


Reply via email to