On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:51:09 +0100 Matt Keenan <Matt.Keenan at Sun.COM> wrote:
> On 20/04/2009 10:34, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:01:56 +0100 > > Matt Keenan<Matt.Keenan at Sun.COM> wrote: > > > >> Dick, > >> > >> Are you trying to use The Desktop JDS CBE ? > >> If so then try following the steps here : > >> http://blogs.sun.com/mattman/entry/how_to_build_jds_on > > > > Great blogpost. Thank you. It's in my bookmarks now. > > It does not cover however all the other packages needed to compile > > SFEpackages. Just the installation of the CBE. It may be a nice > > thing to add the needed pkgs in this post too. > > > > Missing packages dependencies should be handled by the spec files > themselves. > > They should contain correct "Requires" and "BuildRequires" lines for > packages they rely on, if they don't then it's a bug in the spec > file ;) True. But what I was pointing at is a list of pkgs that really is needed to compile anything. that is quite more than the ss-dev.pkg It's OK for Gnome I guess, but the SFE packages are far more than that. A lot are only able to compile with GCC i.e. From other posts I now have these pkgs too: SUNWxorg-headers SUNWxwinc SUNWgnome-common-devel SUNWcvs SUNWgnu-automake-110 SUNWgmake SUNWaconf SUNWlibtool SUNWsvn SUNWgnu-automake-19 SUNWgcc SUNWgtkmm With these pkgs (and their deps) all in place I can fully use the CBE. Your pointer to the /usr/share/aclocal/dirlist file was VERY USEFUL. The link to the latest pkgbuild is also very much appreciated ;-) The installation of the SUNWgnome-xml* pkg is not really needed if I do not want to buidl gnome itself I guess. Nor the install of docbook catalog(?). One last question: is there a good reason use the release candidate of the JDS CBE (v1.7+) and not the stable 1.6.2 version? -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: 01D2433D + http://nagual.nl/ | nevada / opensolaris + All that's really worth doing is what we do for others (Lewis Carrol)
