Martin Bochnig wrote: > > So much for that. > FF2 has been a bit slow already (but very stable), so has FF1 at its time. > But FF3's CPU- and mem- hungriness goes over the top. > Enough is enough. > IMO they will lose market share. > > That's an odd comment, considering most reviews of FF3 I've seen commends it for being both faster and leaking less memory tan its predecessor.
It's certainly been stable long term on my desktop since 3.0.3. -- Ian.
