yes i was getting confused . . . . too many numbers BTW are you dropping the JDS moniker soon?
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 02:43 -0700, Damien Carbery wrote: > > vermillion b75 = gnome 2.20 (which goes into nevada > > b76) > > > > nevada b75 = gnome 2.18 > Unfortunately you are wrong for both statements (but I can understand the > confusion wrt nevada b75). > > The build numbers, for both JDS Nevada and JDS Vermillion builds, always > corresponds to the target Nevada build i.e. Vermillion b75 would target > Nevada b75. > > Is your mention of b76 a typo? > > The name of the crossover build is always confusing, even internally. We used > to use vermillion-stable and vermillion-devel but that was also confusing for > people. > (It's a bit like when someone says that a curry is hot - is it 'hot' > temperature or 'hot' spicy - I stick to hot/spicy to avoid ambiguity). > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
