On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 12:20 -0700, Dale Sears wrote: > Xfce desktop? > > It's really nice on Sun Ray servers. In my experience, it was > a significant boost in performance which all of my users noticed > and appreciated. That was a while ago, and I only had about 8 > users on a V240... but still, it was nice. :-)
I have no objection to that, but I'm going to declare it outside the scope of this discussion... consider the spec to be for the default *GNOME* desktop configuration, any other desktop environments we decide to ship can work out their own specs :) Cheeri, Calum. > > Calum Benson wrote: > > We're starting to document what the default desktop configuration for > > the Indiana 1.0 release should be, and naturally we'd like your > > feedback. > > > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/desktop/uispecs/indiana-uispec/ > > > > Right now it only covers panel and menu layout; more sections will be > > added over the next couple of days. However, I'm sure there's plenty > > for you to get your teeth into already, e.g.: > > > > - One panel or two? > > - Launch menu or Apps/Places/System menu? > > - What applets/launchers on panels by default? > > - Icons (e.g. Home folder) on the desktop by default, or empty desktop > > by default? > > - GNOME or KD... no, let's not get into that one :) > > > > Fire away... > > > > Cheeri, > > Calum. > > -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:calum.benson at sun.com GNOME Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
