On 5 May 2006, at 05:12, Glynn Foster wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Glynn Foster wrote:
>> Hey,
>> So a number of the preferences menu entries have needless renames.  
>> Is this really desirable/necessary - just thinking in terms of  
>> patch maintenance and localization cost. Does it really get us  
>> anywhere?
>> Proposed                   Community
>> =====================================
>> File Manager               File Management

No strong opinion on this one, just bringing forward what we've  
always had in JDS.  Community version is fine, if a little  
inconsistent.  (It opens the File Manager Preferences dialog, not the  
File Management Preferences dialog.)

>> Fonts                      Font

Hmm, there was actually a community bug open about whether it should  
be "Font" or "Fonts"... forget which way it went in the end.  Depends  
whether or not you're the sort of person who reads the menus as  
sentences ("Preferences->Font == Font Preferences")... Font makes  
more sense in that case.  But since there are multiple fonts to  
change, you might be more inclined just to look for a menu item  
called "Fonts".

>> Session                    Sessions

Similar argument again... the Session capplet only (realistically)  
lets you edit the current session, so "Sessions" seems wrong to me here.

>> I'd like to avoid doing these types of changes.

I'd like to persuade the community to take them :)

> Not to mention just about every tooltip change the spec mentions.  
> Is this *really* necessary, and could this be done more efficient  
> in the upstream community?

Yes, I'd especially like to get the tooltip changes back; most of the  
current ones suck bananas, and the proposed ones use a consistent  
style/terminology that actually explain what the applications do :)

Cheeri,
Calum.

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer       Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum.benson at sun.com            Java Desktop System Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum             +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems



Reply via email to