Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> If GLX is not working, then this would likely cause problems for
> any program that requires OpenGL.  Therefore, I'd expect that
> compiz would not work on your system.  It would be interesting
> to find out if the problem goes away if you switch your window
> manager to metacity.

I believe it's always being running metacity.

> I'm not sure the best way to do this if your system hangs when
> the session starts.  Normally you enable or disable compiz in the
> "Appearance" properties dialog.
>
> Note that the /usr/bin/compiz script has code to try and identify
> whether the system can support compiz or not.  Perhaps that code
> is not working on your system for some reason?
>
> You could try hacking the /usr/bin/compiz script so that it just
> always calls "abort_with_metacity".  Does that make a difference?

If I'm running metacity (i.e System->Preferences->Appearance
Visual Effects set to "None", will it still try to run/start compiz?


> On 01/04/10 14:51, Rich Burridge wrote:
>> John Martin wrote:
>>> On 01/ 4/10 02:24 PM, Rich Burridge wrote:
>>>> Aborting with metacity
>>>> Reason : /var/log/Xorg.0.log reports nvidia graphics driver not
>>>> installed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Had you previously installed an alternate NVIDIA driver?
>>
>> Not that I'm aware of.
>>
>>> The IPS bug which
>>> removes non-empty directories populated by SYSV packages will remove 
>>> the
>>> NVIDIA X driver as the X directory paths changed in b130.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian Cameron wrote:
>>> The following message in your log looks suspicious to me:
>>>
>>> > Aborting with metacity
>>> > Reason : /var/log/Xorg.0.log reports nvidia graphics driver not
>>> > installed.
>>>
>>> Is there any information in the Xorg logs that might highlight
>>> the problem?
>>
>> I'm not an expert on this, so I've attached the Xorg log file from
>> build #130 which fails (Xorg.0.log.bad) and the one from build
>> #129 that works (Xorg.0.log.good).
>>
>> It would appear to be a problem with the GLX driver, but I don't
>> believe I've done anything special here (apart from the image-update).
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>

Reply via email to