FTR, I would strongly advise against that, see
https://github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/issues/110#issuecomment-736224503
. You want the tests to work independently on the hardware it's running
on, so that you can run it on e.g. standard autopkgtest infra.

You could create /sys/firmware/efi/efivars/ tarballs of a bunch of real
systems with the properties that you want, keep them in the tests, and
unpack these in your test cases. You most probably just need a few of
them, so you can strip them down or possibly create them individually as
files, but a full tarball might be the quickest start.

** Bug watch added: github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/issues #110
   https://github.com/martinpitt/umockdev/issues/110

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-drivers-common in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906320

Title:
  fake-device-wrapper should bind-mount efivars

Status in ubuntu-drivers-common package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  /usr/share/ubuntu-drivers-common/fake-devices-wrapper should bindmount
  efivars under testbed.get_root_dir().

  Ie. such that /sys/firmware/efi/efivars is correctly available under
  the umockdev test-bed.

  That way when testing subiquity, it should correctly observe if it was
  booted under secureboot, or not.

  Or maybe we can create a few options to fake-devices-wrapper whether
  or not to present Secureboot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/+bug/1906320/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to