Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu. Karmic reached EOL on April 30, 
2011.
Please see this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases

I've tried recreating this bug with Oneiric and was unable to, given the
information you've provided. Please either a) upgrade and test or b)
increase the verbosity of the steps to recreate it so we can try again.

Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.

** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) => (unassigned)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-system-monitor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456249

Title:
  gnome-system-manager processes list is incomplete, high-cpu process
  missing

Status in “gnome-system-monitor” package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: gnome-system-monitor

  In different situations the gnome-system-monitor applet accurately
  reports 100% CPU usage but when clicked, the application doesn't show
  any process as consuming higher CPU.

  A side-by-side comparison of top and gsm shows the inconsistency (see
  attached).

  In the attached screenshot, one can see the gs process consuming CPU,
  which does not appear in the gsm output.

  ProblemType: Bug
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Tue Oct 20 07:42:20 2009
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: gnome-system-monitor 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  ProcEnviron:
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
  SourcePackage: gnome-system-monitor
  Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-monitor/+bug/456249/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to