On 15 May 2013 22:22, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >> sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386 > Is this the way that each Ubuntu user should go? I never saw this > command before and I think it should not be necessary for > packages from the universe repository. >
Usually it is not required. The i386 is supposed to be enabled by default on all (desktop) Ubuntu amd64 systems. There are a few reports that certain install methods are not doing that, but otherwise it is fine for most. >> Note that this is not the same issue described in this bug report. > probably. But I think the 'solution' of this bug is the origin of my issue. > Your efforts to solve the bug are responsible that wine cannot be installed > anymore on amd64 > This bug tracks enabling multiarch for packages in the depends/recommends tree of wine. That is not related to the issue you are experiencing. If you do not have i386 repositories enabled, that is a misconfiguration of your system. Wine is not going to be installable on pure amd64, that would be a return to the chaos before multiarch. If you continue to have issues, I recommend you seek help on a support forum. See <http://www.ubuntu.com/support/>. If that process identifies an actual bug, then please file a new report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to xdg-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123710 Title: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64 Status in “apt” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “fonts-droid” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-horai-umefont” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-liberation” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-unfonts-core” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “gnome-exe-thumbnailer” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “ttf-wqy-microhei” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “winetricks” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “xdg-utils” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “fonts-liberation” package in Debian: New Status in “fonts-unfonts-core” package in Debian: New Status in “ttf-wqy-microhei” package in Debian: New Status in “winetricks” package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: If a user wants 32-bit only wine, a reasonable way to get it would be to install wine1.4:i386. However, this is not possible on amd64. Currently apt spews this complaint: wine1.4:i386 : Depends: wine1.4-i386:i386 (= 1.4.1-0ubuntu4) Recommends: gnome-exe-thumbnailer:i386 but it is not installable or kde-runtime:i386 but it is not going to be installed Recommends: ttf-droid:i386 but it is not installable Recommends: ttf-liberation:i386 but it is not installable Recommends: ttf-umefont:i386 but it is not installable Recommends: ttf-unfonts-core:i386 but it is not installable Recommends: ttf-wqy-microhei:i386 but it is not installable Recommends: winetricks:i386 but it is not going to be installed Recommends: xdg-utils:i386 but it is not installable gnome-exe-thumbnailer, xdg-utils, and the fonts are arch: all and should be marked multiarch:foreign to indicate that it is ok to install them for the nonnative wine1.4 (they are cross-arch shell scripts). winetricks is currently arch i386 and amd64 and should probably be marked arch: all (especially for upcoming arm wine). apt will then freak out about conflicts and give up. apt-get --no- install-recommends wine1.4:i386, however, will actually complete. I'm not sure this is correct behavior for apt, as in principle it should be able to figure out that it can succeed with the command by omitting recommended packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1123710/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
