(In reply to aceman from comment #123)
> (In reply to comment #122)
> > (From update of attachment 8374439)
> Is this issue really that important that we make tens of comments in such a
> long thread? It is not a perf critical path.
I'm after readability here, not perf, in particular I don't like
breaking at the end of a for loop, because it's easy to miss that this
skips the increment.
> > >+ try {
> > >+ root.copyFolderLocal(folderDeleted3, true, null, null);
> > >+ do_throw("copyFolderLocal() should have failed here due to user
> > >prompt!");
> > I'm not sure why you're trying to throw from inside this try block, but I
> > don't know enough about writing tests to know whether there's a better way.
> I expect .copyFolderLocal to throw and be catched by my catch. But if it
> does not throw (wrong behaviour), the next throw is not catched and fails
> the test.
Sure, but my question is is it safe to put do_throw in a try block?
> > >+ } catch (e) {
> > >+ do_check_eq(e.result, parseInt("0x8055001a", 16));
> > Why not just write 0x8055001a?
> Because e.result returns the code in decimal. Is there other method of 'e' I
> can use?
nsIException.idl (if that's the right one) says that result is an
unsigned long, not a decimal. So I don't see why you can't compare it to
any other integer.
> > >+confirmDuplicateFolderRename=A folder with that name already exists under
> > >folder '%1$S'. Would you like to copy the folder under a new name of
> > >'%2$S'?
> > A subfolder with that name already exists in the folder '%1$S'. Would you
> > like to move the folder using the new name of '%2$S'?
>
> Irving proposed some other wording with more arguments. So what should I do
> now?
Sorry, I hadn't seen his wording. How about:
A subfolder with the name '%$1S' already exists in the folder '%2$S'. Would you
like to move this folder using the new name of '%3$S'?
(I don't really want to use a / because that's an implementation detail.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/214366
Title:
Can't delete a folder if Trash already contains a folder of the same
name
Status in Mozilla Thunderbird Mail and News:
In Progress
Status in “thunderbird” package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Bug description:
Binary package hint: mozilla-thunderbird
1. Create a new folder, eg. "Temp"
2. Delete it, OK
3. Create the same folder again
4. Delete it, OK
I expect it to be moved to my Trash folder, perhaps with a suffix
appended (it being the second instance of that folder in the trash).
Thunderbird popped up an error message. On an imap host:
The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded: Mailbox
already exists.
In the local folders:
A folder with that name already exists. Please enter a different name (!)
Workarounds:
1. Empty the trash
2. Rename the folder before deletion
3. Rename the folder already in the trash
4. Delete (permanently) the folder that is already in the trash
Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy
thunderbird 2.0.0.12+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.7.10.0
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/thunderbird/+bug/214366/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
