Thanks, that should probably be reported upstream on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=udisks
** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511468 Title: udisksctl doesn't accept absolute object-paths Status in udisks2 package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: If I issue "udisksctl dump" and then issue "udisksctl info" for one of the objects in the dump, I get an error message. For instance: $ udisksctl info --object-path /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q_TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q (udisksctl info:4995): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL **: g_dbus_object_manager_get_object: assertion 'g_variant_is_object_path (object_path)' failed Error looking up object with path /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q_TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q This is confusing. It turns out that object paths must be relative to /org/freedesktop/UDisks2. For instance: $ udisksctl info --object-path drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q_TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q /org/freedesktop/UDisks2/drives/TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q_TSSTcorp_CDDVDW_SH_S223Q: org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Drive: [snip] I don't know if this is a bug in the executable or in the man page. In either case, I suggest it would be very helpful to state in udisksctl(1) that relative object paths must/can (whichever it is) be used. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/1511468/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
