@Alberts, I'll do some more tests and come up with hard numbers concerning the 
performance of metacity with or without compositing. I do believe that in some 
cases it will be possible to optimize the performance through appropriate bug 
reports and patches; but I also strongly believe that there will be other cases 
where the different design choices (compositing) will come with an unavoidable 
performance hit.
And while e.g. "3 times slower" may be acceptable in new e.g. core i5 systems, 
it's not acceptable in new e.g. atom systems. It doesn't affect only old PCs or 
networked X, it's just that it's more visible there.

@Dmitry and Alberts, what if LTSP users find it necessary to have compositing 
off by default? (as a local setting in their installations)
What issues should they expect from gnome-flashback then?
 - Harder window resizing due to 1 px border.
 - Notify-osd notifications ==> I did a quick test and they seem to work; 
albeit without transparency. Did I miss something?
 - Decorations ==> Example? I couldn't reproduce it.
 - Various docks ==> Example?

And more significant, how much support should they expect from gnome-flashback 
developers for the non-compositing case? For example, your support in all the 
bug reports that I've filed so far was excellent!
Does that mean that you won't be willing to do any non-compositing related work 
at all?
Would you be willing to guide persons that are interested in working on such 
issues? Or to accept patches from them?

I understand that gnome-flashback isn't specifically targeting old or networked 
clients, but does that also mean that it doesn't care at all about that use 
case?
If that's the verdict, then maybe LTSP should evaluate other desktop 
environments like Mate as the default (I think "marco" defaults to 
non-compositing in 16.04).

No matter the answer(s), I again want to thank you very much guys for
all your work! :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1565640

Title:
  Set compositing-manager=false by default

Status in metacity package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  In Ubuntu 12.04 and 14.04, metacity's compositing-manager was false by 
default.
  In 16.04, it's been set to true.

  I tried to pinpoint the advantages vs the disadvantages of that, and 
currently I've only seen disadvantages.
  I was testing with: gsettings set org.gnome.metacity compositing-manager 
false (or metacity --no-composite)
  versus: gsettings set org.gnome.metacity compositing-manager true (or 
metacity --composite)

  Speed: the speed for window drawing and moving around is 3-5 times
  slower when compositing is enabled. This is rather visible locally on
  old computers, but it becomes a real problem when Xorg is used over
  the network, like for example in LTSP thin clients. There, dragging
  around a window draws it in slow motion a whole lot behind the mouse,
  like a trail, while with compositing disabled, everything is lightning
  fast.

  RAM: xrestop shows that with a couple of windows open, metacity now
  needs 10 MB more RAM. This value increases with the number of open
  windows.

  Vsync: in most cases vsync was broken with or without compositing
  (while with compiz it's working much better). I tried with youtube
  videos, with VLC etc. The only difference I saw is that with some SDL
  games like teeworlds, vsync was working with compositing disabled, and
  was broken with compositing enabled.

  So my personal results is that metacity's compositing-manager=true
  doesn't have any advantage currently, and that it makes old client and
  LTSP client performance a whole lot worse. And unfortunately those are
  exactly the cases where we prefer gnome-session-flashback instead of
  e.g. Unity.

  Therefore I'd like to ask you to consider disabling it by default like
  it was in the past.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/metacity/+bug/1565640/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to