Debian does it differently - is there any advantage over each method?
I'm wondering if we should just copy the Debian init script entirely,
given the Ubuntu version seems very out of date.
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1564616
Title:
detaching lightdm into background
Status in lightdm package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
Hi
When starting /etc/init.d/lightdm (either directly from root console
or through SysV init), it will get stuck because lightdm doesn't fork
into background when starting.
Please could you add --background option to start-stop-daemon to fix
this? (note: the debian lightdm package already does this)
This change is needed for ubuntuBSD (which uses SysV init to manage
system daemons).
Thank you!
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1564616/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
