With this fix, my IPv6 service from Comcast broke. Specifically, they hand out an IP on the /64 via dhcpv6, with the default gateway being an IP on the same /64, along with an IA /56 for the customer to use locally.
Adding the default route fails because there is no route to said gateway (since we have decided that we have a /128). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609898 Title: dhclient incorrectly assumes a /64 ipv6 prefix Status in isc-dhcp package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in isc-dhcp source package in Precise: Fix Released Status in network-manager source package in Precise: Invalid Status in isc-dhcp source package in Trusty: Fix Released Status in network-manager source package in Trusty: Triaged Status in isc-dhcp source package in Xenial: Fix Released Status in network-manager source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in isc-dhcp source package in Yakkety: Fix Released Status in network-manager source package in Yakkety: Fix Released Status in isc-dhcp package in Debian: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] clients who get an ipv6 address from a dhcpv6 server assume the address has a /64 prefix, but that is not necessarily true, and if the subnet is different than /64 those clients will not be able to reach other addresses in that /64 prefix because the other systems are not on-link. This /64 assumption of dhclient effectively breaks the client networking for certain addresses. [Test Case] Set up a server with two interface nics, and one client connected to each of those interfaces. On the server, set up a ipv6 subnet on each interface, with a larger prefix than /64, e.g.: 2001:db8:0:0:1::/96 2001:db8:0:0:2::/96 configure dhcpv6 on the server, to provide ipv6 addresses on each interface. Set the server as the default ipv6 route for the clients. Allow the clients to get dhcpv6 ipv6 addresses from the server. The clients will each get a ipv6 address with a /64 prefix, due to the bug in dhclient. Try to ping (or otherwise communicate) between the clients. Since they have /64 prefixes, they think they are on-link with each other, but they are not, so they can't communicate. After the dhclient bug is fixed, repeat the above setup, and the clients will get /128 prefixes instead, and then will be able to communicate with each other, because they will route the traffic to each other through the server. [Regression Potential] Non-standard (i.e. not /64) subnets served by dhcpv6 currently are broken, this fixes that. However, any ipv6 network configurations that rely on the previous incorrect assumed /64 behavior (as described here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5942#section-5) in order to allow dhcpv6 clients to communicate with other systems inside the subnet, but do not use RA to also provide clients with the actual prefix len, will break. To clarify: a server that provides clients with dhcpv6 addresses, but does not also provide the prefix len via RA, will change behavior; previously, all clients on the subnet could talk directly to each other, with this update the clients cannot talk to each other directly; all traffic between clients will be routed through the default gateway. Further, if the network does not provide a default gateway - for example a local network that is intended only for traffic between local servers - the clients will not be able to talk to each other at all. Note that such configurations *are* broken configurations, that just happened to work before because of incorrect dhcp client behavior; such configurations must be updated to perform RA to provide the prefix len to clients. See comment 30 for details on how to configure radvd to restore network functionality. [Other Info] This is fixed in debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=684009 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1609898/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
