Launchpad has imported 33 comments from the remote bug at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=563313.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-09T19:43:50+00:00 Richard wrote: Description of problem: After updating to ghostscript-8.70-5.fc12.x86_64, the printer only prints black pages with small vertical lines and some patterns on it. After downgrading to ghostscript-8.70-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm, everything works fine again. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ghostscript-8.70-5.fc12.x86_64 cups-1.4.2-20.fc12.x86_64 turboprint-2.12-1.x86_64 (from http://www.turboprint.de/) How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Update to ghostscript-8.70-5.fc12.x86_64 2. Print something (e.g. a PDF file or a test page). Actual results: The printed page is mostly black with only some vertical stripes and patterns on it. Expected results: The page is printed correctly. Additional info: I am using turboprint as driver for my Canon Pixma IP 4000. I don't know if this is a bug in ghostscript or an incompatibility with turboprint. Anyhow I could reproduce this behaviour on two Fedora 12 x86_64 machines. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-11T13:10:11+00:00 Tim wrote: Please attach the PPD for the queue you are using. You can find this in the /etc/cups/ppd directory. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-11T22:15:15+00:00 Richard wrote: Created attachment 390356 ppd of the printer queue Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-12T15:21:26+00:00 Tim wrote: Thanks. This is some kind of regression in the ghostscript cups driver. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-12T15:29:07+00:00 Tim wrote: Created attachment 390508 in.ps.bz2 (PostScript input for reproducer) This file, along with the PPD, shows the problem. 1. bunzip2 in.ps.bz2 2. PPD=tp0.ppd gs -sDEVICE=cups -r600x600 -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH -sOutputFile=out.rast 3. rasterview out.rast Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-16T12:57:34+00:00 Tim wrote: *** Bug 565804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-16T12:58:46+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.70-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.70-6.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-16T22:01:38+00:00 Richard wrote: ghostscript-8.70-6.fc12 fixes the bug for me. Thank you! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-17T18:22:30+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-1.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-1.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-18T22:50:22+00:00 Peter wrote: 8.71-1.fc12 works for me Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-19T11:55:34+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-19T18:54:02+00:00 John wrote: Using Fedora 12 and turboprint-2.13-2.i586.rpm. Update from ghostscript-8.70-2.fc12.i686.rpm to ghostscript-8.70-5.fc12.i686.rpm started the black print page problem. Update to ghostscript-8.71-1.fc12.i686.rpm initially fixed it but after reboot black page again. Tried ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686.rpm but still black page. Dropped back to ghostscript-8.70-2.fc12.i686.rpm and works again (had to remove ghostscript and all dependencies first). My printer is a Canon MP780 and installed as local using tpu://Canon/MP780 . Error in /var/log/messages :- Feb 19 18:14:41 mail kernel: tpu[3334]: segfault at 64 ip 00d53bed sp b7809154 error 4 in libpthread-2.11.1.so[d4c000+16000] Feb 19 18:14:41 mail abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-1266603281-3323' creation detected Feb 19 18:14:41 mail abrtd: Lock file '/var/cache/abrt/ccpp-1266603281-3323.lock' is locked by process 3356 Feb 19 18:14:42 mail abrt[3356]: saved core dump of pid 3323 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/tpu) to /var/cache/abrt/ccpp-1266603281-3323/coredump (11063296 bytes) Feb 19 18:14:42 mail abrtd: Executable '/usr/lib/cups/backend/tpu' doesn't belong to any package Feb 19 18:14:42 mail abrtd: Corrupted or bad crash, deleting Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-20T00:29:30+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghostscript'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-1891 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-20T09:48:23+00:00 John wrote: Still only ghostscript-8.71-1.fc12 showing on yum update. Tried to install ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686.rpm manually but got the same error which meant I had to completely uninstall ghostscript and dependencies first :- sudo rpm -Uvh /data/ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libgs.so is needed by ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686 libgs.so.8 is needed by (installed) libspectre-0.2.3-1.fc12.i686 sudo yum provides /usr/lib/libgs.so.8 ghostscript-8.70-2.fc12.i686 : A PostScript interpreter and renderer. Repo : installed Matched from: Other : Provides-match: /usr/lib/libgs.so.8 Which has nothing to do with libspectre. 8.70-1 installs fine. Should 8.70-2 really be checking for libgs.so ? rpm -qlp /data/ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686.rpm | grep libgs /usr/lib/libgs.so.8 /usr/lib/libgs.so.8.71 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-20T10:11:28+00:00 John wrote: Removed ghostscript and dependencies, e.g.turboprint using sudo yum remove ghostscript. Still complaining about libgs.so , so sudo rpm -Uvh --nodeps ghostscript-8.71-2.fc12.i686.rpm sudo rpm -Uvh turboprint-2.12-2.i586.rpm This time nothing actually get sent to the printer and no error messages. Turboprint print monitor just shows "Printer: USB error". Reinstalled 8.70-2 and works fine, monitor says "Printer: idle". Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-20T20:04:49+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/15 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-20T21:16:22+00:00 John wrote: Installed ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 successfully and tested ok before and after a reboot. Thanks, John. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-22T22:08:20+00:00 Peter wrote: 8.71-4.fc12 finally worked for me, too, older version segfaulted with turboprint gs[18071]: segfault at 2 ip 00000002 sp bfd20b64 error 4 in gs[755000+1000] gs[18077]: segfault at 9 ip 00000009 sp bfd861c4 error 4 gs[18114]: segfault at 2 ip 00000002 sp bfdd4264 error 4 gs[18119]: segfault at 9 ip 00000009 sp bff1b694 error 4 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-23T05:30:15+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghostscript'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F12/FEDORA-2010-2576 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-02-27T03:34:46+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-02T01:09:11+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-03T01:50:18+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-04T00:08:58+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-06T03:39:05+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-4.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-15T16:31:58+00:00 Tim wrote: In ghostscript-8.71-5.fc12 I've reintroduced the change that originally caused this, but with a fix for this particular issue. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-16T15:38:52+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-6.fc11 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-16T15:40:03+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-6.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-16T15:41:34+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-9.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-9.fc13 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-18T03:18:23+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghostscript'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-6.fc12 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-18T03:31:15+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ghostscript'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-6.fc11 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-24T23:39:46+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-9.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-13T01:55:36+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/53 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-20T13:28:23+00:00 Fedora wrote: ghostscript-8.71-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/+bug/539708/comments/54 ** Changed in: ghostscript (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: ghostscript (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ghostscript in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539708 Title: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster failed Status in GS-GPL: Fix Released Status in ghostscript package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ghostscript source package in Lucid: Fix Released Status in ghostscript package in Fedora: Fix Released Bug description: Binary package hint: cups I tried to print some file using Chromium. I got the message that printing has failed. After diagnosing, I get the message: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pdftoraster failed. This is on a Canon iP4500 printer. Printing to the pdf printer still works. Also, a test page does work. So, I guess it has something to do with the printed file. (which is created using Chromium and GMail: - start chromium - go to gmail - select conversation - click print in drop down menu) I noticed a couple of things: - Printing the file directly from Chromium does not work. - Printing from Chromium to pdf and printing the created pdf does not work also. - However, printing from Firefox does work! - Another webpage is printed fine using Chromium As the file contains some private information, I cannot attach it here. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Mar 16 17:56:42 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha amd64 (20100122) Lpstat: device for Canon-iP4500-series: usb://Canon/iP4500%20series device for Canon-iP4500-series-2: usb://Canon/iP4500%20series device for PDF: cups-pdf:/ MachineType: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD MS-7512 Package: cups 1.4.2-9 Papersize: letter PpdFiles: Canon-iP4500-series: Canon PIXMA iP4500 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.5 PDF: Generic CUPS-PDF Printer Canon-iP4500-series-2: Canon PIXMA iP4500 - CUPS+Gutenprint v5.2.5 Simplified ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic root=UUID=0f104604-00b2-4b97-962f-b48f8c29db01 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: cups Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64 dmi.bios.date: 03/09/2009 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: V3.4 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P45 Neo2-FR (MS-7512) dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD dmi.board.version: 1.0 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD dmi.chassis.version: 1.0 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV3.4:bd03/09/2009:svnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:pnMS-7512:pvr1.0:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnP45Neo2-FR(MS-7512):rvr1.0:cvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:ct3:cvr1.0: dmi.product.name: MS-7512 dmi.product.version: 1.0 dmi.sys.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gs-gpl/+bug/539708/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
