Hi Brian I've succesfully installed and tested the `librsvg2-*` v2.48.9-1ubuntu0.20.04.1 packages on focal and can confirm that they work as expected for me, meaning i.a. that the bug I suffered from in the previous v2.48.7 is fixed.
I've used the CLI `rsvg-convert` as well as the R package rsvg[1] (which uses the C bindings provided by `librsvg2-dev`) to convert SVG images to PDF. Everything was fine, no regression as far as I can tell. Thank you very much, Oliver, Brian and everyone else involved for the SRU work! [1]: https://github.com/jeroen/rsvg#readme ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to librsvg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1903329 Title: SRU the current 2.48.9 stable update Status in librsvg package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in librsvg source package in Focal: Fix Committed Bug description: * Impact That's the current GNOME stable update, which fixes a number of issues, including a regression[1] since librsvg 2.40.x which was shipped in Ubuntu 16.04. The NEWS file[2] summarizes the relevant changes between Ubuntu 20.04's current librsvg 2.48.7 (that version was also introduced by an SRU back in July[3]) and the current version 2.48.9. The complete list of changes is available on GNOME GitLab[4]. * Test case The update is part of GNOME stable updates[5]. Smoke testing by opening SVG images with eog or importing them with gimp can be performed to ensure there are no regressions. * Regression potential This is a bugfix-only stable micro-release, however librsvg is a core component with a number of reverse dependencies. A combination of autopkgtests and manual smoke testing to try and detect SVG rendering issues should be performed. * Notes about this report This is my first SRU request (and at the same time my first launchpad bug report). I'm not really familiar with the whole SRU process which is why I first asked about it on Ubuntu's official discourse forum[6]. Canonical's Sebastien Bacher encouraged me to open this ticket. I've copied over some parts of the last librsvg SRU ticket[3]. I hope this is fine. Thanks for considering this SRU. [1]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/issues/642 [2]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/blob/librsvg-2.48/NEWS [3]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1884326 [4]: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/librsvg/-/compare/2.48.7...2.48.9 [5]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME [6]: https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/most-straight-forward-way-to-get- librsvg2-microrelease-update-into-focal-updates/19238 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/librsvg/+bug/1903329/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
