Sorry if this is the wrong place to discuss this, but - is the thought on this to look at what programs/capabilities are available to the user on a fresh install and evaluate options to prune those, or to look at reducing the installed size required to deliver the same capabilities as the mantic default install? (Things like the other bug mentioned in the Discourse post, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd- rootfs/+bug/2038906 , I assume)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038901 Title: Ubuntu default/minimal installation is only ~11% smaller than full installation Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Ubuntu default/minimal installation should be made smaller in future. It's a little too close to the full install size right now. As of mantic 2023-10-10, the default/minimal install ends up 8.4 GB whereas the full install is 9.4 GB. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vSmQLXuDO0E-tKnWcgjL3Ua2bWDeUg4ICZIfuMrrZndBrYjbVLKAWlKuiZLZ9EOrj4N1WV37DRg8GyW/pubchart?oid=2040836911&format=interactive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/2038901/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
