hey IsoLinearCHiP,
In fact, if you set a non existing conffile to gconf, this one will just check 
if it exists and ignore it if not. This is done only one on the server side and 
so, it's a fast operation.

In addition, it's better to do that at that stage for bootime speed (as
the check will be done later, the first time gconf is invoked and not at
each time you log in, and every other processes waiting on the check to
appear). Also, you probably already know that gconf is going away quite
soon, so I think this is not something we should really work on.

So, in a summary, technically this is a good idea, but in practice, I
think we unfortunately shouldn't change that, for speed and
effectiveness issue.

Thanks a lot for working on that though and do not hesitate to submit
other ideas to ubuntu! :)

** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop
Packages, which is subscribed to gconf in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/914102

Title:
  Suggestion: do not set gconf env vars to non-existing files

Status in “gconf” package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Hi,

  I'm not entirely sure whether this really is a sensible idea, but I'll
  let you be the judge of it. I just stumbled over this while trying to
  understand the Xession startup process and this seemed off for the
  variables to be pointing to non-existent files. If this is intended or
  even needed ignore this suggestion.

  I am referring to the file gconf/debian/70gconfd_path-on-session.

  I am attaching a diff with commented changes I propose, do note
  however I do not have knowledge of the inner workings of gconf. :)

  Cheers.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/914102/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
Post to     : desktop-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to