Hello Kay,
Kay Ramme wrote:
>> So, I decided to make Common Desktop Infrastructure based on D-BUS.
> What a shame. I would have loved to see Uno there ... though I believe
> you have your reasons.
I understand your heart. Because I saw the design which consider
every possible technical viewpoints.
However, history did not become as expected.
>> If one component model is chosen, other project developers feel to
>> be controled by using the component model via bridge. Even if nobody
>> means it.
> I am not sure I understand you correctly, IMHO a component model does
> not control anybody, especially wrt your project, it just does enable
> inter-operation ... so it is feature :-)
Each component models are core of each technologies (KDE, GNOME,
Mozilla, OpenOffice.org). In other words, each technologies depend on
each component model. This means my opinion.
So, we designed the architecture which don't control every technologies.
btw, do you participate in DAM5?
I plan to participate in DAM5.
Although I'm not good at speaking English, I want to meet you.
And I want to discuss about this and my future plan.
Regards,
--
Daisuke Kameda
Japan KDE Users' Group: President
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kde.gr.jp/~daisuke/
immodule for Qt Project: Project Maintainer
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fimmodule_2dqt
SMG Co., Ltd.: Engineering Creator
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.smg.co.jp/
http://www.smg.co.jp/opensource/CommonDesktopInfrastructure/
_______________________________________________
Desktop_architects mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
