On Wednesday 14 December 2005 17:29, Martin Konold wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 12:22 schrieb Tomasz Janowitz: > > Hi, > > > unfortunately I find both have become a bit "top heavy" and seem > > sluggish on older equipment often found in schools and non-for-profit > > organizations. > > I am not willing to accept this often repeated point without actual > numbers. For KDE I claim that it became faster over time provided you > compare the same feature set and do the correct configurations.
Cool, so now we're going to add one more flamewar about performance? Ok, let me make it more interesting by saying that KDE can start as quickly as Xfce[*] and let's see more flames coming. Seriously, could all the discussions about GNOME print dialog, possibilities of GNOME configuration, mouse jumping while copying files and similar things be please moved to wherever they belong? I don't think that this wherever is this list. [*] Which it actually can as bootcharts in my blog show, but that's beside the point here as well. -- Lubos Lunak KDE developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373 190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374 Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
_______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
