On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 20:24 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Would it be a bad idea to have a mode where you can't even do silly things > like that by mistake? Keep the core menu entry fixed, for example? No > doubt. When it comes to making a mess of it, my daughter is better at > _creating_ the mess than she is at straightening the end result out. > > But does that mean that you shouldn't be able to configure things if you > want? Hell no. It just means that _different_ users have different views > of what "confusing" and "configurability" means.
GNOME has plenty of settings you can lock down to stop people getting into a mess; if you maintain their machines, did you ever consider doing any of this for their accounts? If not, was it lack of an obvious way to do so (during installation or elsewhere) that prevented you from doing so, or some other reason? Or perhaps lockdown stuff is too fine-grained for your scenario anyway, in which case, would something more like OSX's "parental controls" (sucky name) be more appropriate? http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/family/ Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GNOME Desktop Group http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects