[ Constantinos P. Spiliakos, Mi., 21. Feb. 2007 21:38 ] > True, Gnome might be easy to learn, but then, so is KDE, Gnome is quite > archaic in some ways (nautilus for example) but quite efficient in other > ways (low memory usage).
It is true that Gnome has a very efficient memory usage compared with e.g. Windows XP or Vista. The same can be said with even greater truth of the other desktops: http://ktown.kde.org/~seli/memory/desktop_benchmark.html http://swik.net/GNOME/Planet+GNOME/Callum+McKenzie:+KDE+vs.+GNOME: +Memory+Use/qmla Olaf _______________________________________________ Desktop_architects mailing list Desktop_architects@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop_architects
