Hi Roy,
I adjusted the Copyright notice for APR and APR-Util in the form the web
server uses it. I hope it is OK now? Otherwise please let me know.
Thanks and best regards,
Rainer
Am 30.03.24 um 21:54 schrieb Roy T. Fielding:
On Mar 30, 2024, at 1:40 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Mar 30 20:40:29 2024
New Revision: 1916666
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1916666&view=rev
Log:
Update copyright year
Modified:
apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/NOTICE
apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/include/apr_version.h
Modified: apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/NOTICE
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/NOTICE?rev=1916666&r1=1916665&r2=1916666&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/NOTICE (original)
+++ apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/NOTICE Sat Mar 30 20:40:29 2024
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Apache Portable Runtime
-Copyright (c) 2000-2023 The Apache Software Foundation.
+Copyright (c) 2000-2024 The Apache Software Foundation.
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
Modified: apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/include/apr_version.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/include/apr_version.h?rev=1916666&r1=1916665&r2=1916666&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/include/apr_version.h (original)
+++ apr/apr/branches/1.8.x/include/apr_version.h Sat Mar 30 20:40:29 2024
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
*/
-#define APR_COPYRIGHT "Copyright (c) 2000-2023 The Apache Software " \
+#define APR_COPYRIGHT "Copyright (c) 2000-2024 The Apache Software " \
"Foundation or its licensors, as applicable."
/* The numeric compile-time version constants. These constants are the
This is an old format for the copyright notice. It should be the same
as for httpd (which hasn't been updated in a while). IOW,
Copyright 2024 The Apache Software Foundation.
and
#define APR_COPYRIGHT "Copyright 2024 The Apache Software Foundation."
because this notice is for the package as a whole and the other bits
make it an invalid/ambiguous notice.
....Roy
