On 2020-Dec-31, at 18:07, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Comparing the old and new 32-bit arm limits to arm64 . . .
> 
> arm:
> 
> -#define      MAXDSIZ         (512UL*1024*1024)       /* max data size */
> +#define      MAXDSIZ         (1856UL*1024*1024)      /* max data size */
> 
> vs. arm64:
> 
> #define       MAXDSIZ         (1*1024*1024*1024)      /* max data size */
> 
> So arm64 now has a smaller MAXDSIZ than 32-bit arm.
> 
> Is that intensional?
> 

For reference for other comparisons of how things are
now for MAXDSIZ :

# grep -r MAXDSIZ sys/*/include/vmparam.h
sys/amd64/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef MAXDSIZ
sys/amd64/include/vmparam.h:#define     MAXDSIZ         (32768UL*1024*1024)     
/* max data size */
sys/arm/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef       MAXDSIZ
sys/arm/include/vmparam.h:#define       MAXDSIZ         (1856UL*1024*1024)      
/* max data size */
sys/arm64/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef MAXDSIZ
sys/arm64/include/vmparam.h:#define     MAXDSIZ         (1*1024*1024*1024)      
/* max data size */
sys/i386/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef MAXDSIZ
sys/i386/include/vmparam.h:#define      MAXDSIZ         (512UL*1024*1024)       
/* max data size */
sys/mips/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef MAXDSIZ
sys/mips/include/vmparam.h:#define      MAXDSIZ         (1*1024UL*1024*1024)    
/* max data size */
sys/powerpc/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef   MAXDSIZ
sys/powerpc/include/vmparam.h:#define   MAXDSIZ         (32UL*1024*1024*1024)   
/* max data size */
sys/powerpc/include/vmparam.h:#define   MAXDSIZ         (1*1024*1024*1024)      
/* max data size */
sys/riscv/include/vmparam.h:#ifndef MAXDSIZ
sys/riscv/include/vmparam.h:#define     MAXDSIZ         (1*1024*1024*1024)      
/* max data size */

(powerpc64 and 32-bit powerpc both show figures above.)

===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-main
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to