On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 7:57 PM Ravi Pokala <[email protected]> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Kyle Evans > <[email protected]> > Date: 2022-04-12, Tuesday at 17:34 > To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]> > Subject: git: 454630c72556 - main - stand: libefi: swap /Pci() printing around > > The branch main has been updated by kevans: > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=454630c72556d45e401f29f56b3317c2fb0499a0 > > commit 454630c72556d45e401f29f56b3317c2fb0499a0 > Author: Kyle Evans <[email protected]> > AuthorDate: 2022-04-13 00:29:54 +0000 > Commit: Kyle Evans <[email protected]> > CommitDate: 2022-04-13 00:30:30 +0000 > > stand: libefi: swap /Pci() printing around > > Printing device followed by interface matches, e.g., edk2. Note that > this is only a fallback, many firmware implementations will provide > the > protocol that we'll use to format device paths. > > "(device,function)" makes more sense anyway, since that's the logical > organization (i.e. each unique device may have multiple functions). > > What was the rationale for doing "(function,device)" in the first place? >
Based on tsoome's reaction when I pointed it out, the rationale was "whoops" :-)
