On 4/4/23, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:30:54 -0700 > Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@cschubert.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 17:54:28 +0000 >> "Pokala, Ravi" <rpok...@panasas.com> wrote: >> >> > Cy, >> > >> > The patch adds 'bool done_outvp', unconditionally sets it to 'true', and >> > then later has a check for 'if (!done_outvp)'. Since there is no >> > intervening place where 'done_outvp' could be set to 'false', that check >> > will never succeed and that branch is unreachable. >> >> It's set to false at line 6454, in the loop locking vnodes. >> >> > >> > Or am I mis-reading something? >> >> Maybe Rick can explain but all we're doing is ensuring that the first >> part of the loop is executed only first time through. We could invert it >> and save setting it to false every loop. > > No. Looking at it more closely, I was wrong. What Rick is doing is > probably the best approach. > >> >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > Ravi (rpokala@) >> > >> > > I'll try to put together a review tonight. Having said that, I don't > want to take the credit for this "final" fix. We have Martin and Rick > to thank for doing the heavy lifting. > >
massaging names for the commit is not a problem -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>