> Most of the commits seem to not even be flagged for MFC to stable/15 from > what a quickl glance showed.
Some commits are not flagged with MFC because some people forget or because it's unclear whether a MFC will be done at the time of the initial commit. IIRC, in the cases I had to fix, some commits without tag had to be MFCed as dependencies of other ones, so I wouldn't rely on the absence of such a tag alone to make decisions. > So why don't we just stop wasting more time on i386 kernel builds in main or > stable/15 and leave to it those people who do want to MFC to stable/14 still > to be careful (or deal with the fallout)? That's what I'm calling "let go of i386", and that looks like a legitimate option. srcmgr@ will discuss that. Regards. -- Olivier Certner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
