Am 16.01.2012 um 19:26 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 16-1-2012 16:06, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> can the \setnumber/\setstructurecounter syntax be changed to allow also
>>
>> \setnumber[…][3]
>>
>> besides the current
>>
>> \setnumber[…]{3}
>>
>> The first form fits better with the other setup commands etc.
>>
>>
>> \unprotect
>>
>> \unexpanded\def\setstructurecounter
>> {\dodoubleempty\dosetstructurecounter}
>>
>> \def\dosetstructurecounter
>> {\ifsecondargument
>> \expandafter\dosetstructurecounteryes
>> \else
>> \expandafter\dosetstructurecounternop
>> \fi}
>>
>> \def\dosetstructurecounteryes[#1][#2]{\ctxcommand{setstructurecounter
>> ("\@@thestructurecounter{#1}",1,\number#2)}}
>> \def\dosetstructurecounternop[#1][]#2{\ctxcommand{setstructurecounter
>> ("\@@thestructurecounter{#1}",1,\number#2)}}
>>
>> \let\setnumber\setstructurecounter
>
> another option is to combine them with the subs and have three arguments (one
> being optional) and drop the {} variant (not used that often in the core
> anyway and I will provide a fast {}{} variant anyway)
+1
Wolfgang
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
