On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 16:15:33 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the \singlebond (as well as the \doublebond and \triplebond) command
> doesn’t produce a symbol when you put a number after it.
>
> \starttext
>
> $ l\singlebond r $\crlf
> $ 1\singlebond 2 $\crlf
> %$ 1\doublebond 2 $\crlf
> %$ 1\triplebond 2 $
>
> \stoptext
>
> Wolfgang
I am not familiar with $\singlebond$ etc.
In ConTeXt, one can also use a different mechanism (chem-str.mkiv):
\chemical{1,SINGLE,2,DOUBLE,3,TRIPLE,4}
Looking at the result of the above, I find that the spacing of DOUBLE
should be modified (to .25ex rather than .5ex), a question of
aesthetics?
Compare this with a third mechanism (mp-chem.mpiv, drawing a chemical
structure rather than writing an inline chemical formula):
\startchemical
\chemical[ONE,Z0,SB1,Z1,MOV1,Z1,DB1,MOV1,Z1,TB1,MOV1,Z1] [1,2,3,4]
\stopchemical
Ignore that the horizontal spacing is different, too, for the structure
ONE.
Alan
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
