On 2/24/2016 6:19 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
In strc-mat.mkiv, we have:
\let\startplaceformula\placeformula
\let\stopplaceformula \relax
But would it not be more coherent with respect to ConTeXt syntax for it
to be used as:
\startplaceformula [reference=ref]
\stopplaceformula
rather than the present
\startplaceformula [ref]
\stopplaceformula
? \startplaceformula should take all of the options of \setupformulas.
In the case of named formulas (\placenamedformula), one could have
\startplaceformula [reference=ref,title=name]
\stopplaceformula
This would of course require some minor modifications.
i made the next ... so it's not entirely compatible (we need to keep the
explicit \start..\stop because there can be matrices as well (unless i
also patch those but let's not go too fast)
\starttext
\startplaceformula
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\startplaceformula[-]
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\startplaceformula[x]
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\startplaceformula[reference=foo]
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\startplaceformula[title=whatever]
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\startplaceformula[suffix=x]
\startformula
e=mc^2
\stopformula
\stopplaceformula
\stoptext
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
