On 25/10/2013 10:55 PM, Jeff Stedfast wrote:
The beauty of BouncyCastle's OpenPGP implementation, in my eyes, is
that it is not tied to 32bit vs 64bit or any particular processor
architecture. Now, of course, that can all fall apart if it doesn't
actually work or if it's buggy to the point of not being able to
interoperate with gpg and other pgp implementations. I don't know if
it is or isn't. I suspect it works, but if development has stalled and
the OpenPGP implementation is unmaintained, then it might not be
viable because, as other implementations mature and/or bugs are found,
if they don't get fixed, I'm going to want to move into something
else. That's part of what I'm hoping to find out.
The C# version of OpenPGP is a little out-of-date relative to the Java
version, but most problems you are likely to encounter would likely be
resolved by figuring out what changes need to be ported over. The Java
version has benefited from a lot of field reports of interoperability
issues, so I think/hope you will be somewhat pleasantly surprised.
Pete.
