Hey guys, Sorry I forgot to include this earlier. I do know that RbXPCOM exists, but its version 0.0.4 and it hasn't been released since 2001-08-12. Is this still a valid binding with the current stable version of XPCOM? I'm between using RoR or Java, and it seems the Java bindings are much more mature and robust. Is this a correct assumption?
Thanks, Todd On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Todd Nine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm trying to design a pet project I'm working on, and I could use some > input from those with some experience embedding Mozilla. Basically, I want > to create an application to allows my friends and I to pull data from > multiple sites. I'm not sure if it'll be a desktop app, or a combination of > firefox plugin and webapp. I would like the following. > > 1. Create a Firefox plugin to allow recording. I've done some > digging, and Deja-click is the closest thing to what I'm shooting for. > However it doesn't quite do what I want, and a lot of the data is compiled > into xpt files. Is there something I can use to decompile these and to get > an idea of how it works? > > 2. I would obviously prefer that the data aggregation tool and my > plugin share a similar engine. As a result, I'd like to compile my code > and > share it among components. > Is it possible to bridge Ruby as both a caller of the Gecko engine, > and as logic in a plugin without extra local installation of ruby? > > I've read the wiki on embedding and code, and I've downloaded the latest > stable source from the ftp server for Firefox 2.0.0.12. Is this the > source I should use, or should I download the latest stable for XULRunner? > I want to make sure that anything produced by a plugin will use a compatible > rendering engine. > > Thanks in advance! > Todd > _______________________________________________ dev-embedding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding
