User-Agent string was one of the first things I looked at. The example CNN Video that Steve Lu mentioned yesterday for example, won't play with out standard user-agent string but does when left unmodified.
-- Glen Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 2 May 2008, at 14:37, Grant Gayed wrote: > Hi Glen, > > There was a problem until recently in SWT's Safari-based Browsers when > accessing gmail and google calendar because they look for certain > user-agent > strings in the request header to decide what to enable. Embedding > cases may > not have these strings if they are added by the browser (eg.- > "Firefox/...") > as opposed to the renderer (eg.- "Gecko/..."). I don't know if this > is what > you're seeing, but I see some similarity in your description. The > swt bug > report is https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=220836. > > HTH, > Grant > > > "Glen Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Thanks Chris, >> >> I am glad though, as it means it's a problem in code that I'm >> comfortable with and I've a working reference point. >> >> I'm getting swamped with some other stuff at the moment so I probably >> won't get to finish this off today. But the plan is to strip it right >> back in my code and build it up again to see if I can isolate it. I'm >> sure I'll have a few questions about some of the API's that I didn't >> recognize, so you'll still be hearing from me. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Glen Gray >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> On 2 May 2008, at 13:27, Christopher Blizzard wrote: >> >>> Glen Gray wrote: >>>> Ok, thanks to Chris's IRC prompting yesterday, I rebuilt xulrunner >>>> with --enable-tests (on F9, firefox's --enable-tests doesn't do >>>> anything for GtkMozEmbed testing, it has to be xulrunner). >>>> >>>> After a long re-build, I was able to test with TestGtkEmbed. I'm >>>> pleased to say that TestGtkEmbed DOESN'T exhibit the problem. >>>> This is >>>> good news for me as it means I've a reference implementation to >>>> compare API calls with and see if I'm doing anything stupid or >>>> missing >>>> anything in my initialization of the browser. >>>> >>>> I'll keep you posted as to any further progress I make with my own >>>> code base. >>>> -- >>> >>> I'm actually sad that it wasn't easy to reproduce in TestGtkEmbed. >>> Now >>> we can't help you track it down. :( >>> >>> --Chris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-embedding mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-embedding mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding _______________________________________________ dev-embedding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding
