Pedro P. Ribeiro wrote:
Thanks Timothy!
Yeah, this is far from being trivial..
If fact, this is one of the aspects that I'm trying to evaluate and compare
with WebKit and IE. So far, Gecko solution seems to be much more complex.
But what would you say about using XULRunner, build a regular XUL
application and use XPCOM to link the UI with the C++ logic behind? Is that
the case you've mentioned and pointed debugging as the big issue?
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 16:17, Timothy Madden <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
It is not hard, it just takes a few days to build and read XPCOM
documentation until you can implement those nsIWebBrowserChrome and
nsIEmbeddingSiteWindow interfaces, which are pretty trivial in the end.
Of course, the outcome depends on your patience and your experience as a
developer.
Do you know how to use WebKit ? This Gecko thing is quite hard for me
and I would also like some other embedding solution if better ...
Sorry what I have tried I already presented. Embedding XUL applications
would be something as new for me as for you. I only used C++ and I am
still to see how would I create any XUL or JavaScript "applications". I
must admit your idea is interesting but as I said I would be happier if
I could find some better embedding solution. One the other hand I doubt
I cound find such a solution that will allow me to get into its
internals like Gecko does.
Timothy Madden
_______________________________________________
dev-embedding mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding
