> On 17 Sep 2015, at 09:18, Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 17/09/2015 09:45, Chris Mills a écrit : >> >>> On 17 Sep 2015, at 08:40, Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Le 16/09/2015 23:56, Prateek Jadhwani a écrit : >>>> >>>> Thankyou Adam, Alexandre, Andrew and Douglas for sharing your insight with >>>> me about the DRM keys. I guess we will need other solution then. >>>> Any other suggestions? >>> >>> Sorry but there is already a lot to do to have rock solid ports working >>> on a range of devices, I don't think we should spend time chasing ghosts >>> like this. >> >> Well, surely this is going to just be a problem on the Dogfood devices, and >> other devices that feature similar DRM junk that we install FxOS on, right? >> So it won’t be a problem in final release devices anyway..? >> > > What final devices ? There is such thing. And yes it will be a "problem > on the dogfood devices". But we are dependant on DRM policies from OEM. > It's not in our hands at all.
Well, I appreciate there are no devices coming out with Firefox OS 2.5 on them now, but there will be in future, and surely any such devices are less likely to have such DRM in place? That’s what I meant. > > The best we can do is work on open source libs for improving quality of > images. Which is far from our mission. > > Even with those "limitations" that are not due to B2G but to DRMs, > Camera on the Z3c is far more better than anything we had on a supported > device in the past. We have a lot to work, IMHO, before having to worry > about this … Yup I agree entirely. _______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
