muy cache! On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Wilson Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wow! Can email share what changes they made to get such a big improvement? > > *W I L S O N P A G E* > > Front-end Developer > Firefox OS (Gaia) > London Office > > Twitter: @wilsonpage > IRC: wilsonpage > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Eli Perelman <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello fxos, >> >> With deadlines for v2.5 approaching, I thought I would take a couple >> minutes and summarize the current state of performance for Gaia. At the >> outset of v2.5 we captured metrics of v2.2 and have used that as the >> baseline to determine whether applications have regressed their performance >> since. Any applications whose performance has significantly regressed since >> v2.2 will need approval to not block as major increases will block v2.5. >> >> Enough of the chatter, here's the data: >> >> Calendar v2.2 cold launch: 1454ms >> Calendar current cold launch: 1638ms (~180ms regression) >> Calendar v2.2 USS: 14.01MB >> Calendar current USS: 13.99MB (good) >> >> Camera v2.2 cold launch: 1492ms >> Camera current cold launch: 2090ms (~600ms regression) >> Camera v2.2 USS: 13.83MB >> Camera current USS: 16.05MB (~2.2MB regression) >> >> Clock v2.2 cold launch: 1232ms >> Clock current cold launch: 1260ms (acceptable) >> Clock v2.2 USS: 13.98MB >> Clock current USS: 14.95MB (~1MB regression) >> >> Contacts v2.2 cold launch: 773ms >> Contacts current cold launch: 1246ms (~475ms regression) >> Contacts v2.2 USS: 18.26MB >> Contacts current USS: 20.04MB (~1.75MB regression) >> >> Dialer v2.2 cold launch: 851ms >> Dialer current cold launch: 944ms (~90ms regression, still under 1000ms) >> Dialer v2.2 USS: 17.48MB >> Dialer current USS: 13.04MB (good!) >> >> Email v2.2 cold launch: 2129ms >> Email current cold launch: 606ms (good!) >> Email v2.2 USS: 16.17MB >> Email current USS: 15.78MB (good) >> >> FM v2.2 cold launch: 604ms >> FM current cold launch: 783ms (~175ms regression) >> FM v2.2 USS: 10.37MB >> FM current USS: 10.51MB (acceptable) >> >> Gallery v2.2 cold launch: 1113ms >> Gallery current cold launch: 1207ms (~90ms regression) >> Gallery v2.2 USS: 17.71MB >> Gallery current USS: 18.98MB (~1.25MB regression) >> >> Music v2.2 cold launch: 1066ms >> Music current cold launch: 1717ms (~650ms regression) >> Music v2.2 USS: 13.37MB >> Music current USS: 29.49MB (~16.12MB regression) >> >> SMS v2.2 cold launch: 1340ms >> SMS current cold launch: 1630ms (~290ms regression) >> SMS v2.2 USS: 12.86MB >> SMS current USS: 19.94MB (~7MB regression) >> >> Settings v2.2 cold launch: 2474ms >> Settings current cold launch: 2950ms (~475ms regression) >> Settings v2.2 USS: 17.18MB >> Settings current USS: 17.54MB (acceptable) >> >> Video v2.2 cold launch: 1115ms >> Video current cold launch: 1309ms (~190ms regression) >> Video v2.2 USS: 12.13MB >> Video current USS: 13MB (acceptable) >> >> TLDR; there seem to be quite a few serious regressions across many >> applications, in both cold launch time and USS memory usage. As a >> comparison, the Test Startup Limit app when first captured started off in >> the 880ms range, spent a good chunk of June and July around 620ms and is >> now around 850ms. >> >> If anyone has any questions about the data or needs additional >> information, please let me know. >> >> Also, kudos to the Email team for the massive improvement in both launch >> time and memory. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eli Perelman >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
