Zibi does a lot of manual testing for himself before he checks in the code
as far as I know.
He also checks in automation tests.  He also follows up and creates bugs
for all the issues he's aware of.

He's asked me a few times when he ran into flashing issues on device or
compile issues.

I think he's a pretty good engineer.  :)


On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Michael Henretty <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for this update zb, please keep sending these!
>
> It is amazing how little you guys break Gaia considering the amount things
> your code affects. Reforming L10n takes surgical precision. And as Justin
> said, your focus on performance has made all of FxOS better. So keep it up!
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Justin D'Arcangelo <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Amazing work guys! Thanks to the shiny new API in l20n.js, the Music NGA
>> re-write was able to take full advantage of all the goodness it brings,
>> including RTL-compliant time formatting and the client/service split for
>> views via bridge.js.
>>
>> Also, many, many thanks for all the perf improvements! :-)
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 4, 2015, at 12:30 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Gaiaers!
>> >
>> > I'd like to start a new tradition of providing you with a summary of
>> work that has been done during the a given cycle in my module[*].
>> >
>> > It may be surprising for people less familiar with complexity of the
>> l10n ecosystem to notice that our L10n team has been so visible in the
>> number of commits - both me and :stas accruing over 120 commits in this
>> cycle placing us both in top 20 commiters.
>> >
>> > The reason is: L10n is complex. It's also severely under-developed
>> compared to most layers of modern app systems. And that is both, a curse
>> and a blessing. A curse because we have no-one to learn from. Nobody has
>> figured it out, no GUI toolkit has a good l10n system and we're with l10n
>> more or less where the webdev world was with HTML4 and PHP.
>> >
>> > The blessing is that we have an opportunity at Mozilla to push the
>> state of the whole industry. It's a niche where with limited resources that
>> we have, we can make the Web Stack better than any other stack.
>> > I humbly believe that we are doing it, and 2.5 is an important
>> milestone on that route.
>> >
>> >
>> > The biggest accomplishment of this cycle for us is the introduction and
>> deployment of new L10n API. This API is based on years of research work by
>> an L10n team in Mozilla led by Axel Hecht. When we took over L10n module in
>> Firefox OS, we started moving the module and refactoring the codebase to
>> work in the paradigms of that approach.
>> >
>> > And at the beginning of 2.5 cycle Stas landed revision 3 of our API in
>> Gaia source.  Right now it's opt-in:  the code needs to link to
>> shared/js/intl/l20n.js to use it.
>> >
>> > For the rest of the cycle we improved the new codebase vastly improving
>> performance and memory consumption. At this point L20n 3.0 beats the
>> previous API in features, security, performance and memory.
>> >
>> > This, and a lot of refactoring of the code to be more asynchronous,
>> allowed us to move the first four Gaia applications to it - Music, FM, SMS
>> and FTU are fully transitioned and running on top of the new API.
>> >
>> > Other highlights:
>> >
>> > * Significant improvements in our test coverage, asynchronous non-racy
>> APIs and security of HTML l10n
>> > * Huge progress in reduction of our technical debt. We removed
>> thousands of lines of complex JS code replacing them with simple
>> declarative HTML attributes
>> > * DOM Overlays API allows us to localize Document Fragments
>> > * Bidi markers make composed localized strings work well in LTR/RTL
>> scenarios
>> > * We transitioned whole Gaia to use Intl API for date and time
>> formatting which significantly improves Firefox OS user experience in
>> non-latin based languages
>> > * We moved to use the same Intl API in our composed localization
>> strings for number formatting, so any numbers passed to l10n as variables
>> will be formatted properly for the current locale
>> > * After trying multiple solutions we settled on an amazing module
>> bundler internally, rollup.js, which helped us save memory.
>> > * We leveraged the new internal architecture to properly use
>> client-service bridge architecture in multi-view apps (see Music)
>> > * Made our build system much more strict about l10n errors allowing us
>> to catch many potential race conditions with localization resources
>> > * Introduced first experimental version of our future localization
>> format - l20n
>> > * We deployed mozIntl API that is a staging ground for future
>> JavaScript Intl API
>> > * Lots of work on ECMA TC39 group to get a lot of features needed for
>> Firefox OS into Intl API rev. 3 (ES7).
>> > * migrated our pseudo-locales to work well with Intl API (following
>> Google pseudo-locales rather than Microsoft pseudo-locales)
>> > * We're helping with a lot of performance related work, with both me
>> and :stas becoming peers of the Performance Module and improving our
>> ability to make Gaia apps start fast in any locale
>> > * We are working with JS/Gecko and Gonk teams to fix long standing
>> time/timezone/date problems to make our platform work well across timezones.
>> > * deprecation of the old l10n_date.js library in favor of Intl API and
>> mozIntl
>> > * removal of over 400 calls to the deprecated mozL10n.get method!
>> > * some ground work to enable our whole build/l10n workflow to handle
>> our new l10n format
>> >
>> >
>> > That's a lot of work. Over 120 commits in gaia 2.5 is just the visible
>> part of the iceberg with over 300 commits to our l20n.js repository and
>> lots of work going to various l10n/intl polyfills, ECMA specs and other
>> repos.
>> >
>> > With 2.5 being done, we already started working on 2.6 cycle which
>> we're very excited about because it feels like we have less and less of
>> cleanup work, and we start to work on real improvements and new features!
>> We still have some debt, but we believe 2.6 may be *the* cycle in which
>> we'll finish that part of our work.
>> > So, what's in our plans? Here are some teasers:
>> >
>> > * Final rush to remove all mozL10n.get calls (almost 500 calls to
>> remove). Most of that work is in System and Communications
>> > * Integration tests - we now have a framework for that and we can start
>> testing our HTML/DOM API in the browser
>> > * Move (almost) all apps to l20n.js and deprecate l10n.js
>> > * Introduce declarative Intl API for HTML
>> > * Try to remove build time optimizations for l10n
>> > * More work on advancing Intl API and getting 3rd edition of ECMA 402
>> to have everything we learned we need to make Firefox OS look good
>> > * Start using our new localization format and introduce new l10n
>> features that it allows for
>> > * Move language packs to our build system
>> > * We are starting to look at Web Extensions and browser.html and poke
>> them with a probing stick
>> > * We are experimenting with exposing l20n.js 3.x to the Web community.
>> Supporting some older browsers like IE11 is the current crux.
>> >
>> > I don't know how many of those goals we will be able to accomplish in
>> this cycle and how many will have to catch the next train, but with those
>> features, I believe that we will have the best multi locale UI platform in
>> the World. And that's a goal worth pursuing!
>> >
>> > Thank you to all reviewers, committers, allies, RTL team, and the
>> amazing sheriffs who had to back out a few eagerly landed patches. We're
>> working on it! :)
>> > zb.
>> >
>> >
>> > [*] I believe it would be valuable for us to start providing such
>> per-cycle summaries rather than per-quarter summaries. Quarters are
>> artifacts of our management structure, not our project structure.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > dev-fxos mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-fxos mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-fxos mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-fxos mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos

Reply via email to