On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Jim Porter <[email protected]> wrote:

> No bug should be ignored. I know that's hard, especially in large
> components, but I don't think we can just crowdsource triage. To a user,
> any bug they file is ipso facto valid, and we should do our very best to
> at least give them the time it takes for us to reply to the bug. Even if
> our response is WONTFIX, it's better than leaving those bugs in limbo.
>
> This might prove unmanageable for some large components, but even if we
> just made it a goal to be really diligent about triaging *new* bugs,
> we'd likely get better results (and avoid frustrating new bug-filers who
> try to help us).
>

To clarify what I said, votes are in no way a replacement for bug triage.
Dealing with all the bugs that get filed but never looked at is another
problem, one which is indeed *not* addressed by votes. But, votes might
proves useful in helping us get an idea of which features a lot of
foxfooders care about. I believe that is the intent here.


> As a former(?) Thunderbird developer, I've seen some of the problems
> with Bugzilla votes first-hand. I imagine Desktop developers have seen
> even more problems. To quote Ehsan Akhgari from a discussion about
> removing the "votes" feature from Bugzilla[1]:
>
> "I cannot remember a single instance where I or someone who I know has
> used the number of votes on a bug as an input for making a decision, and
> that is for good reason, since the number of votes tell you nothing
> about how severe a problem actually is, and everything about, well, how
> many people have voted for it.
>

>From what Peter described, finding out how many people are interested in a
feature is exactly what they are looking for. So far, I haven't seen a
counter proposal to votes for tracking this, and I don't think your
suggestion of evaluating when "members of the community post well-reasoned
arguments for why a feature matters" gives us this metric. What we are
looking for is an easy way to track when foxfooders want to "+1" a feature.

Are there better ways to collect a count of how many foxfooders are
interesting in particular features?


>
> If they haven't already, I highly recommend the participation team
> discuss this with the Desktop team, since they've been around for a long
> time and I'm sure many people there have strong opinions about how
> well-suited Bugzilla votes are to this problem.
>

+1. Leveraging past experience here can only help.
_______________________________________________
dev-fxos mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos

Reply via email to