Le 11/01/2016 14:39, [email protected] a écrit : > Le lundi 11 janvier 2016 11:56:23 UTC+1, Alexandre Lissy a écrit : >> >> And if you look carefully, that is not being redistributed from >> Mozilla's servers, but from T2M ones. > > I didn't noticed it! Now it's clear that "not being redistributed" has to be > understood from Mozilla's point of view, not as "not being redistributed at > all". I didn't catch it beforehand. > >> Flashing new base system from T2M > > OK. So does it mean that Gonk upgrade can only be initiated by manufacturers? > And then Mozilla takes on the work to adapt Gecko/Gaia code to the updated > Gonk API, independently of the FxOS version?
At some point, given this is closed source and not in the hands of Mozilla, I see no other way than the manufacturer/OEM doing that. > >>> Is mixing files coming from the same Android "version" (KK 4.4.2 in the >>> present case) but not necessary the same Android "build" (KVT49L vs KOT49H) >>> allowed (there's no problem with exported symbols in kernel modules for >>> example)? > > So, is a locally built KOT49H kernel able to interact with KVT49L binary > blobs/proprietary firmware provided by the manufacturer (T2M in the present > case)? That depends on the differences ... I think there is no change to interfaces with minor releases so it should be okay. > > Thanks for the clarifications anyway. > > Émeric > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > _______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
