To note, I was hoping to have a better messaging to the public, and gave
warning to people who are in charge of the dogfooding program.  The short
of it is what I stated in the previous message.  (Sorry, I hit send a
little too soon).

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Naoki Hirata <[email protected]> wrote:

> Because we killed OTA/FOTA due to a security issue.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mihai Barbat <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is this the reason why there was no update today on nightly-latest?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Hubert Figuière <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/02/16 11:16 AM, Alberto Pastor wrote:
>>> > Gij11 and Gij18 are broken since Jan 26th [1]. Is anybody looking at
>>> >  it? I tried to check what’s going on, but both pass locally without
>>> >  problems. I haven’t found a gaia commit that could have caused this
>>> >  by the time it started failing.
>>> >
>>> > Does anybody has a clue? Is treeherder somehow running differently
>>> > than when running the test locally? It seems that both are related to
>>> > the AudioChannels. I created [2] and [3] to track the progress.
>>>
>>> I'm gonna be on a hunch here:
>>>
>>> 1. I believe the change is in the platform, aka Gecko
>>>
>>> 2. It pass locally but not on automation: we have seen discrepancies
>>> with this on the music app, caused be the difference in the sound
>>> management at the OS level: on automation the sound devices are
>>> "dummies" and cause a different set of error codes. At least they were
>>> when we tried to properly deal with playback errors and everything
>>> started failing.
>>>
>>> 3. I don't think there is a need to change the test. The test check that
>>> we show the playback icon which is done in response to sound events
>>> (and AudioChannel). It is how these events are sent that could have
>>> changed.
>>>
>>> Again, this is just a hunch and I could be totally wrong.
>>>
>>> Hub
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev-fxos mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-fxos mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-fxos mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos

Reply via email to