Sounds good to me.

Looking forward to it.

One question I have:
Will they contribute/exchange their algorithms with Ichnaea to help Mozilla improving MLS own accuracy further? I mean Ichnaea's current algorithms are pretty basic (it creates and intersects bounding boxes).

Regards,
Felix

Am 14.03.2015 um 00:28 schrieb Toby Elliott:
These are all reasonable questions and things we wrestle with. Here's some of 
my perspective. Others in the team are welcome to chime in with additional 
thoughts.

On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:

On 06/03/15 12:56, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
We've finally been able to announce our new partnership with Combain AS, head 
over to our blog post:

https://blog.mozilla.org/services/2015/03/06/combain-deal-helps-expand-mozilla-location-service/
A commenter on that blog post asked the following question:

"I think the community deserves to know more details about this data
exchange. Is Mozilla's proprietary Wi-Fi database now the IP of Combain?
Our current database will not be going over to Combain. They will be receiving 
new readings that we acquire. I don't think IP is the correct term to use here 
- it implies it is now somehow exclusively theirs and they can keep others from 
it. They merely have a copy of data we send to them.


Are stumbler contributions now being used for that company's profit?
Indirectly, yes. Ultimately, that's the goal of this project - to make the map itself 
just a fundamental piece of data, not "owned". We believe that this will help 
encourage an array of companies to sprout up to provide superior offerings and greater 
choice in the geolocation space from what is available today.

Of course, to get there, we have a long way to go, both in terms of filling in 
the map and working out the various privacy issues. Combain helps with both of 
these goals, as well as helping us with improved lookups.

Since the Wi-Fi database was deemed too private to release to the
public, unlike like the cell ID database, what precautions are being
taken when sharing it with Combain?
Combain is, in many ways, the ideal initial partner. They are interested in the 
data to improve their overall positioning map, and are using it in ways that 
are relatively innocuous. The problem with the raw data is that it does have 
sharing concerns that are still to be worked out, and Combain is already used 
to these from maintaining their own raw-data database. They'll handle our data 
as carefully as they handle their own.

For those who trust Mozilla, what grounds are there for extending that trust to 
Combain?
You shouldn't, inherently. We have pretty good radar for how companies that want to use 
the data plan to do so, and Combain "feels" pretty good to us, but there's 
nothing contractual enforcing that. Their interests (which can be seen on their website) 
are definitely in providing accurate positioning, rather than using the data in less 
appealing ways, but ultimately location services are sold - via api - to third parties, 
and it's not reasonable for us to be dictating what those third parties can or cannot do.

In the event that Combain fails to live up to our expectations (general, not 
contractual), we have the option to terminate the contract any time.


What data from
Combain, if any, will ever find its way into the public domain?”
So I have to be a little handwavy here, because we're talking about a special 
plan for Combain data. Let's talk about the generic case first.

Our general contract places no requirements on the data. It'll go into the main 
corpus and, as we figure out how to share that, can be shared. Other contracts 
may have restrictions on what we can do with the data; those contracts are 
obviously less important to us, but if they can help improve MLS, we'll still 
consider them.

The Combain contract is a general one. However, we've been wrestling with how to measure 
the quality of MLS, and one of the things we're thinking of doing is moving the Combain 
data into its own dataset and using it for testing. Our own stumbler data isn't good for 
that - it's biased towards data that we already have - so this data represents a unique 
opportunity. So the answer to this direct question is "no, not for now", but 
not for the reasons that people might think. Ultimately, it should one day be included.

Hopefully these are useful answers. Eventually, we'd like to share as much as 
we possibly can, and we're happy to talk to others who want to use the data to 
see if we can find a reasonable way to make it happen, but there's a lot to be 
solved before we get all the way there.

Toby

_______________________________________________
dev-geolocation mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-geolocation


_______________________________________________
dev-geolocation mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-geolocation

Reply via email to