Am Dienstag 23 März 2010 12:25:04 schrieb [email protected]: > Le mar 23/03/10 09:53, "Manuel Schneider" [email protected] a écrit: > > according to the discussion I had with Tommi 'tntnet', I have copied the > > _old_ status of the ZIM File Format v.4 to a separate page: > > http://openzim.org/ZIM_File_Format/4 > > to keep this information for historical reasons. > > > > The main article > > > > http://openzim.org/ZIM_File_Format > > should now be updated to match the changes we did at the last Developers > > Meeting. > > OK, I now use (so it's tested) all new implemented features and > it works well but part of them are still to be implemented especially > IMO categories and metadatas. > > See: http://openzim.org/Roadmap > > I'm not sure if that's good to have a have a documentation which > describes stuff not yet in the standard implementation. > > Other topic: about the merge tool, this tool would be > really useful... especially if we have a diff tool too. I think zimpatch > will lost a lot of its added value if zimdiff does not exist. > > Regards > Emmanuel > > _______________________________________________ > dev-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://intern.openzim.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-l
Categories and metadata are specified. And while the current implementation lacks direct support for these the implementation is still complete in the way that it produces compatible zim files. Bear in mind that the major goal of the openzim project is about the format and not the implementation. So I need to document the format as we specified it. Zimdiff is a good idea. I will add that to my roadmap. Tommi _______________________________________________ dev-l mailing list [email protected] https://intern.openzim.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-l
